![]() "FSF Wastes Away Another "High Priority" Project". My advice for LibreDWG: if you make a library, choosing a widely compatible license (MIT, BSD, or LGPL) is a very positive choice." For the time being we stick to that, moving to GPL 3 has no evident benefits I know of. It's fine for applications, because it doesn't hurt at this point, but, in my opinion, not for libraries that are designed to be used as freely as possible." "Blender is also still "GPLv2 or later". I don't like dogmatic ideologies, and freeing software by force (as GPL/GNU does) is something I dislike in particular. It prohibits its use in Assimp and for many other applications as well. "Personally, I'm extremely unhappy with their GPL licensing. Archived from the original on 9 November 2016. "What's up with DWG adoption in free software?".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |